I don't understand why CASE says that if other bridal stores wants to take over it should be for free???
As if they are at fault????
HS
So, who is going to pay these bridal shops that are taking over then? Have the couples already paid the runaway person or not? Or, is it not possible the owner past away? And never could open the shop? hehehe"However, the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) said that if another store wishes to take over, there should be no additional charge. "
Not for free. CASE mentioned any store taking over must not charge additional on top of the package price. To me, that's sounds logical.
One of my bride-to-be friends recommends getting wedding insurance, such as: http://www.income.com.sg/insurance/wedding/
Only $136. Guards against situations like these?
Note: I don't work for NTUC Income.
One day they may even insure you for shooting lousy images ....:bsmilie::sweatsm:!! Gah! They try to sell you anything nowadays. Soon they will be pandering a new insurance plan that insures you against you not having an insurance plan.
One day they may even insure you for shooting lousy images ....:bsmilie::sweatsm:
Can start new business: Husband temporary replacement for your Big Day only......If husband don't turn up, will they find replacement? :think:
aiya... CASE. one of the most useless org IMO. just only talk.
Once my American friend got back her $5000 for a overpriced camera bought from Lucky Plaza within 7 weeks. She didn't even need to pay for membership fees.
Once my American friend got back her $5000 for a overpriced camera bought from Lucky Plaza within 7 weeks. She didn't even need to pay for membership fees.