ok as you wish. Picture 7 is fine :bsmilie:
I feel that whether or not a picture is "Fine" is determined from which angle you judge. Therefore from your "Glamour" pg angle, it may fail and I understand your point of view. From my angle of casual shooter though, I wouldnt need a podium to slam people. I prefer to create a platform instead for everyone to stand up on and maximize my fun/friendship off each shoot. Pictures are thus secondary. People comes first
Therefore dun impose your values on me!
Also if i am the model, I would appreciate both flattering and ugly pictures of myself. Without the latter, how do i know where to improve? Furthermore such "imperfect' pictures can in fact be used as her personal life documentary which should be mult-faceted. I wouldn't call it "Fat". I call it a "less-flattering-but-nonetheless-still-me" picture. Afterall Portraiture Photography is not all about Glamour Photography isn't it? This is a Portraiture forum, not a glamour pg or wedding forum
In fact for pic #7 i look more at the pose than the face/neck coz she was the only apprentice model that day which gamely tried out at posing. It is thus commendable for her effort.
Btw i'm not into Glamour pg. I am into "God" photography. My main subjects are the different chinese and indian gods tranced up. No matter what I take, ppl usually dun say my pictures are ugly :bsmilie: It is another type of portraiture pg and out of a deep respect of our subjects