Bokeh King

[meven]

I owned the so-called "Bokeh King" before but could not figure why it was called the King because it did not deliver fantastic Bokeh. Maybe it was because I did not know hot to use it.:bsmilie:

I agree with you 100%, I owned the "bokeh king" before but could never understand why it is called that way. I quickly replaced it with the 35 cron ASPH which I then replaced by the Zeiss Biogon 35/2. I really like the cron ASPH but I preferred to go for the biogon, it costs half the price and is as good as the Leica lens!

In between I also owned the Nokton 35/1.2 and the Nokton 35/1.4, they are good lenses but definitely not in the same league as the Leica or the Zeiss.

 

[third3rdwheel]

You were too drunk to remember after having beers & whisky for anaesthetics!:bsmilie::bsmilie:

Dr, I pity your nose. :bsmilie:

 

[dtohs]

What do you want to see? I'll bring my DryPacks just for you to cheer you up b4 you go under the surgeon's knife.

Doc, just let Gary holds in each hands some nice lens among your collection, that should take his mind off the pain during the ops.

 

[sim4nee]

The cron 35 asph is contrasty - a point to note if you are shooting B&W. But again, this is up to individual preference. Some like contrasty B&W, some like to have details in the shadows. This is a very sharp lens though and very pricey as well. :bigeyes:

Can't agree more. If you're someone who edit the photo like me you want the low contrast lens so that there are more room for adjustment, but if you you just going to use the images right out of camera then high contrast and saturation is the choice.