this is not another digital vs conventional argument..
but what is the different in the print of these 2 techniques, i am refering to the asthetic feels only.
also, i notice that my minolta dual3 scanner couldnot get into the details of overexposed part of a bnw negative...any suggestion to overcome.
but what is the different in the print of these 2 techniques, i am refering to the asthetic feels only.
also, i notice that my minolta dual3 scanner couldnot get into the details of overexposed part of a bnw negative...any suggestion to overcome.