snowspeeder
Senior Member
Looks like a feeble attempt with no substance.
I feel that the top 3 pictures must at least be decent. Blur picture to be listed as top 3 is rather a big NO NO.
Here are my photos.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47030863@N05/sets/72157624477946924/
whatever the case, it's just a competition.
yes, you paid, but photography is always subjective.
no, i have not seen the pictures, but i have seen a lot of competitions where the results do not sit well with me.
but what are we in photography for as hobbyists? the first core reason is to enjoy it. we can't control anyone else, only ourselves.
so, why dwell on such? move on, try again next time. if you think the competition is a scam, then don't join again, i guess. for example, there are competitions that always have the organiser's own photoclub people winning. the winners list just looks like a few names being shuffled around. but is it important? at the end of the day, we should see accolades/achievements in this aspect as a bonus.![]()
Recently I participated in a photography competition organised by Greenlight. The theme was "Happiness in nature" and I paid 10 bucks for it.
Just now, I received the results from them and I was in total dismay. The so called top 3 pictures lack contrast and worse one of the pictures is blurred. Goodness.
I have the feeling I was scammed.
Here's the link.
http://picasaweb.google.com/114259938206124547803/Top3Photos?authkey=Gv1sRgCPL5tf3RoefrIQ#
My usual thoughts are such contests are subjective and the chosen entries might not often agree with us, especially if we ourselves take part in them.
However, as an outsider, I would say
1) Technically, your photo is better than the "selected winners"
2) Compositionally, your photo is better than the "selected winners"
3) The theme of the competition is rather vague or flexible, depending on how you look at it. Its quite hard to deviate from it, and I think your photos do fit the theme.
Well, you would have beaten the "selected winners" if I were the judge. :bsmilie:
Anyway, what I'm more interested in is another point you brought up.
Are there any regulations on the organising of such competitions?
Hypothetically, can one easily create a website and attract entries with submission fees, and then select "bogus winners"?
not really a blur picture, but rather a tightly cropped image i would say.I understand that this is a competition and it's very subjective when it comes to the results. But a blur picture being in top 3?? They are so not good to a point that I have to show u guys these pictures. Just for your entertainment. lol.![]()
Not surprised it a scam..
I understand that this is a competition and it's very subjective when it comes to the results. But a blur picture being in top 3?? They are so not good to a point that I have to show u guys these pictures. Just for your entertainment. lol.![]()
How can the crab be happy when it opens it claws and ready to attack? Oh, maybe, it is the photographer , he/she is looking at the dinner...Recently I participated in a photography competition organised by Greenlight. The theme was "Happiness in nature" and I paid 10 bucks for it.
Just now, I received the results from them and I was in total dismay. The so called top 3 pictures lack contrast and worse one of the pictures is blurred. Goodness.
I have the feeling I was scammed.
Here's the link.
http://picasaweb.google.com/114259938206124547803/Top3Photos?authkey=Gv1sRgCPL5tf3RoefrIQ#