I dun tink that Cow's "emission" was CO2. :think:Really?
Ive read recently that cows and sheep create more C02 than all the cars in the world just from farting. So what, are you going to kill all the cows?
I dun tink that Cow's "emission" was CO2. :think:Really?
Ive read recently that cows and sheep create more C02 than all the cars in the world just from farting. So what, are you going to kill all the cows?
I dun tink that Cow's "emission" was CO2. :think:
Ya.Or is methane? But it's even worse because methane is 20 times more harmful to the environment that CO2.
A did a bit of research about this before... There are some scientists who argue that this 'global warming' is cyclical. It happened before and it will happen again whether we like it or not.
There were studies conducted and showed that the temperature 1000 years ago were not that dissimilar to today's temperature, and a cold period 500 years ago.
And accelerate deforestation for agriculture land!?!so we should stop drinking milk and all be vegetarian :embrass:
Have you check who are the sponsor of these scientific research?
It could be by companies who are negatively impacted by global warming theories, companies who love making profit by not caring about pollution, companies that build unsafe factories in third world countries.
It can be cyclical, but it should be slower than this, this is too fast for the normal evolution.
Al gore showed the melting ice on Kilimanjaro. He implies it is due to global warming. Experts believe the reason is instead man-made deforestation at the base of the mountain, so moist air can no longer be carried up the mountain. They believe the situation is easily repairable of the forrest is allowed to grow back.
Incidentally, i don't approve of Earth Hour or Earth Day. Because these are large, showy celebrations that actually do little to help environmental issues.
Have these experts tried some project to prove their theory or they just say that?
Just want to remind people that there is only one earth and not backup.
Who want to bet using their only one? Lost and then say oops?
Have these experts tried some project to prove their theory or they just say that?
by the way remember elevation of singapore is not that high, I think if sea level go up 1.5m still should be OK can mobilise people to sandbag entire island but if sea level go up 2m the first thing is suddenly there is a scarcity of fresh water because the reservoirs are flooded with sea water.
make it 3 meters and many should change passport and move to other country already.
Your post reminds me... to share the below with all interested.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4056755.stm
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSDHA23447920080414?sp=true
Really?
Ive read recently that cows and sheep create more C02 than all the cars in the world just from farting. So what, are you going to kill all the cows?
hi all,
pls chill leh, I started this thread basically just to share with others about this film which i find it anything to lose if one is interested to watch. Of cos we will never know which ever who and who is 100% right with their "researches" or "facts" they have. What's right and wrong? It just individual's perspectives after watching it, believe it or not is up to oneself.
As for this film, personally i find it logical with some of the "facts" that it shown and how its been explained.
Of cos it will be super duper funny that if i say "let SAVE the world and CHANGE the world now" then i will be the funniest joker in CS.
This thread is just to share and not meant to "fight" or "wont want to lose argument" thing.
Sometime i think, why we willing to use up so many quality time to do these "unnecessary" rather than do something which is more helpful or constructive?
Or do we really need a super huge campaign then we are able to do that bit part that we can? You see, CS is one of a huge platform of photography forum and where people "meet" to share, right?
Do you believe with this "little" strength if you comparing to the world, can do great thing if everyone can jsut help each other for good cause and it's happened. Why not now?
A simple "Movement" do can change the world, even it just a fair bit also good. Still remember the movie, "Pay it Forward"?
Chills people
This campaign is to rise awareness about global warming but not to save the world immediately. It might take decades for people to truly understand and appreciate more about this little home we have, perhaps.
Very good. So your objective is eventually to "save the world", but now you settle for rising "awareness about global warming." This is what we do on an individual level.
You've seen the links on Bangladesh being flooded. Those poor people becoming environmental refugees. What are your thoughts on the matter? How do we help these people? What should governments/scientists/students do?