forbytes said:Hi guys,
anyone using the above mentioned lens. interested in getting one. However, the usual shops I go does not carry this bazoka. :embrass:
forbytes said:Hi Yuhsuan, I have considered that option already... it sum up to something like 2k+, 400/f5.6, but give a little more, i can have a 400/4.5 which is better... I agree with you that 200/2.8 is common but the 2x tele is the problem... hard to find minolta one... Me no interest in using 3rd party convertor for the 200/2.8... that's why... :embrass:
with regards to the 200-400 tamron 5.6, well... I do not think the review is too good for that lens... the 100-400 minolta af APO seems to be better than the tamron bazaka...
vader said:My friend got the 400 4.5 from prime camera at penisular plaza. there is still one more 300 f2.8 apo g lens at prime, S$2080 good deal.
vader said:IMO, the 300mm f2.8 APO G is a steal if the condition is good. couple with the kenko pro TC, WOW!!
forbytes said:Wow, 300mm with Kenko 3x pro TC, 900mm, MOON here i come... :bigeyes:
any decrease in performancing using this setup? I do not have experience with kenko stuff.
TME said:forbytes... did u get your lens finally?![]()