400D Underexposure problem


Status
Not open for further replies.
i just set it once and you can shoot till the battery flat or unless you change modes.

do check it with a grey card first before you do the settings.

This so called underexposure problem could well be a attempt to prevent loss of highlights due to clipping so may not be a problem after all.
 

Blackrushie: No.. i believe only the older version has the underexpose problem..
 

I just got mine fixed..... Happy shooting everyone!!! ;)
 

Hm, how do I know if my camera has this problem?
 

So glad to hear that only older batches have this problem.
But how do i tell whether the one that i will be getting is not from the old batch?
Is there anyway to tell by looking at the camera?e.g. serial number or something?
Thanks in advance to everyone!:)
 

After using the new 400D for about 2 weeks - I have been complaining bitterly to my friend why I can take better pictures with my old G7 prosumer, than this 400D!? Untill he showed me this thread - and I almost fell off the chair !
I need to know if my set is old or new batch and is there a resource I can check thru serial numbers?

Thanks!
 

zingbean: what lens are you using.
it will be good if you shoot when there is ample light if you are using the kit lens.
do U feel your pictures are underexposed when u shoot? or is it just ya shooting technique?

go shoot in the day and post a few pics here to let us understand better. pretty hard for us to visualise.
 

Sorry to revisit this thread again.
It has been raining for the last few days, so tested my 400D yesterday in my study room. Using ISO 800 and no onboard flash, I took some pics of the table clock on my desk.
While I did not check the histogram, based on what I see and what I have taken, the pics looks underexposed. I quickly took out my Sony and Fuji digicams, and set to the equivalent setting, and exposure seems overexposed!
So despite the fact that this is a new set, just purchased last week, it apparently had teh underexposure problem....the problem still persists....

Michael
 

Wah jialat, now how do I know if mine is underexposed -_-
 

Sigh... always thought it was my camera skills since it's my first time handling DSLR. Anywayz, i always find that the underexposed problem usually solved when we set the white balance manually, ie anything other than "Auto".

btw, anyone can help to answer on how to know whether our camera's have the problem with underesposure? or more advisable to send to Canon shop directly?
 

Sigh... always thought it was my camera skills since it's my first time handling DSLR. Anywayz, i always find that the underexposed problem usually solved when we set the white balance manually, ie anything other than "Auto".

btw, anyone can help to answer on how to know whether our camera's have the problem with underesposure? or more advisable to send to Canon shop directly?

White balance has nothing to do with the exposure. I think what you need to do is be in control of the camera.

This whole thread is one that alarms a lot of new 400D users, and everyone thinks their 400D is underexposing.
 

White balance has nothing to do with the exposure. I think what you need to do is be in control of the camera.

This whole thread is one that alarms a lot of new 400D users, and everyone thinks their 400D is underexposing.

Agrees with Calebk...Be in Control of the Aperture for exposure.
Canon 400D is quite a good DSLR for it's price range.
 

White balance has nothing to do with the exposure. I think what you need to do is be in control of the camera.

This whole thread is one that alarms a lot of new 400D users, and everyone thinks their 400D is underexposing.

ya lor.now so many people askin if their 400d got prob. correct mi if i'm wrong
exposure=brighter/darker pic
WB= correct contrast/colour affected by surrounding light
 

So... now how do I know if mine has this problem?
 

Exposure is a mix of Apature, Shutter Speed and ISO setting, on the EOS 400 you can set these Manually or in Av or Tv modes then opt to braket the images. This is probably the best choice if the object is stationary and is something the camera can be set do automatically.
The white balance will change the colour temperature, which may give the impression that the image is underexposed.
To gain maximum control you could choose to shoot Raw. This will allow you to control the processing of the captured image rather than using the camera's pre-progammed settings. This will allow you to make changes to exposure, colour temperature, contrast, brightness etc.

One thing to note when shooting Raw is that the histogram and review image dispayed on the cameras LCD are subject to the camera's built in processing so these may appear different when opened using a Raw convertor.

I choose to set the camera to 'Faithful' and Auto White Balance, and aim to have the images appear slightly overexposed. This is because of how the camera records detail on the chip. Typically DSLRs have a dynamic range of 6 exposure zones. Say Zone 1 is the darkest and Zone 6 the lightest. Zone 6 records twice as much information as Zone 5, and Zone 5 twice as much as Zone 4 and so on. Therefore 'exposing to the right' should provide a higher level of information recorded per shot, allowing more flexibility when processing the Raw image.

Of course there is much debate on these topics and the above is a simplified summary but hopefully it provides some help :)
 

After so long I think I want to send my Canon camera to check if it really has an underexposure problem, as I realise lately that the tone of my pictures always seem a little dark even though I overexpose it by one stop in Manual mode.

To those who have fixed it, may I know how much does it cost? Also how many days does it take for them to complete the job?
 

After so long I think I want to send my Canon camera to check if it really has an underexposure problem, as I realise lately that the tone of my pictures always seem a little dark even though I overexpose it by one stop in Manual mode.

To those who have fixed it, may I know how much does it cost? Also how many days does it take for them to complete the job?

exactly the same problem. would like to know how much will it cost cos my warrant has long been over. and my full-charged batt couldn't last for more than half a day! think i need to get a new battery soon. $$$ flying away.. :cry:
 

yea i needa know the price too. my 400D out of warranty also

actually i feel canon should service all of these 'their-fault' problem for free regardless of warranty status lor

anyway 450D got such probs or not arh?
 

i agree. if it's such a common problem then it's probably a manufaturing error?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top