data1ore said:I admit there is a hint of wanting the best equipment for my hobby, even though I'm not earning my living off it. Yet a larger part of the reason why I buy the best, is also because I believe in having the best in whatever I do. Why go halfway when I can go all the way? Apart from letting myself enjoy this hobby better (aka, more shiok to use), in a funny kind of way it also forces me to become better all the time (otherwise how to warrant using a USD 1k+ lens?). It also gives me the option to freelance and yet not look unprofessional.
I admit the cheaper Tamron is a good alternative - yet it is never going to be L. The 24-70 is also not without its issues, I've seen QC problems (sharpness, red fringing), so once you have a good copy, hang on to it like I am doing!
I think many people share the same idea as you when it comes to the quest for the perfect image quality but many do not share the same deep pockets. True the "L" lens may be superior in terms of quality compared with the "non-L" lens. Eversince I bought my 1st "L" I have not looked back since.
Whatever lens you are using currently, know the quirks and drawbacks and try and work around them. They can still give very good and unforgettable pictures. I've used them previously and still enjoy those images.
