Hi guys,
I tried searching for comparison in this forums but not able to find any. Separately, I have read feedback/comments regarding both lens from this forum and other common reviews from the web.
I do know each lens has their own pro and cons, but I would like to know if putting this 2 lens together, which is a better buy/use.
I use 550D now and may plan to upgrade to 7D, not full frame. I usually shoot during outings with family members, so long focal range is not the priority as mainly shoot group photos. Neither is ultra wide that important since I seldom shoot landscape. If surrounding is dark, I will use flashgun/tripod.
What I understand (correct me if I am wrong):
> For 24-105, on a APS-C, is the effective focal length 38.4-168 due to the 1.6x?
> This means it has further reach, but not wide enough.
> For 17-55, this is a faster lens due to the f2.8.
> But shorter focal length at 17-55, but good for wide angle.
I think the price is very close and both has IS & USM. I think the IQ is equal here? Both are solid built, similar weight and size. Assume I ignore the min and max focal length of each lens and compare similar range, say 38.4-55mm, what would the difference be?
Thanks guys for reading this.
I tried searching for comparison in this forums but not able to find any. Separately, I have read feedback/comments regarding both lens from this forum and other common reviews from the web.
I do know each lens has their own pro and cons, but I would like to know if putting this 2 lens together, which is a better buy/use.
I use 550D now and may plan to upgrade to 7D, not full frame. I usually shoot during outings with family members, so long focal range is not the priority as mainly shoot group photos. Neither is ultra wide that important since I seldom shoot landscape. If surrounding is dark, I will use flashgun/tripod.
What I understand (correct me if I am wrong):
> For 24-105, on a APS-C, is the effective focal length 38.4-168 due to the 1.6x?
> This means it has further reach, but not wide enough.
> For 17-55, this is a faster lens due to the f2.8.
> But shorter focal length at 17-55, but good for wide angle.
I think the price is very close and both has IS & USM. I think the IQ is equal here? Both are solid built, similar weight and size. Assume I ignore the min and max focal length of each lens and compare similar range, say 38.4-55mm, what would the difference be?
Thanks guys for reading this.