canonfan said:
Hi shinken,
1. All I want is a fair price for goods in barely used condition. If selling locally becomes too much of a haggling fest, then I'll just list them on cameragon.com.
2. Is James' treatment of regulars different from that of first-timers? Should I say you referred me? If so, who should I say referred me?
3. Point noted.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Peter
Well if we can compromise on a day and time, I don't mind making a trip down with you to TK, since I have a lens to buy in mind as well. Having said that, they are honest with customers who visit them the first time. I browsed the shop a few times asking for my camera, and in the end I bought the cam from another place. But when I came back to the shop for lens, they still offered me invaluable advice for a beginner at that time. By saying that I get "regular" treatment, I mean I don't have to haggle for prices (which actually applies to most if not all shops), but can readily get the lowest price. Trust me, I was one of those kids who knew which shop sells bread for ten cents less, and I grew up with that scrutiny on prices. I digress. PM me. If you're going down one of these days, we can always arrange to go together.
As for lens recommendation, 85mm 1.2L would be an excellent lens for portrait face shots. Excellent, if not the best. 35mm f1.4L is my "targetted" lens as well, but I had been practising taking portraits using 35mm, and there had been distortion which appears very frequently (face will look stretched out than it actually is, when focused on face). I guess I need to brush up my skills, as I have seen other photos which handled the distortion well by playing with perspective. Another lens you can consider is 24-70 f2.8L. This is a very good piece of lens even for portraits, despite people thinking it is a "general lens" (some examples here:
http://www.pbase.com/deepamp/bali). The downside of this glass is its weight. Coupled with your future 1Ds MkII, I guess you get both good shots and strength training as well. The upside is that it's more forgiving if you are not familiar with the exact focal length to use. If you are confident of handling primes, then my personal first choice would be 85 1.2L for grown ups(low light, extremely shallow DOF), 135 f2L (also good for head shots, and offers a much faster focus, fitting your needs nicely, but missing out on DOF which 85 f1.2 offers), or 35mm f1.4L for kids and babies.
85 f1.2L would be in the region of 3.1k.
35 f1.4L would be in the region of 2.1k
135 f2L, about 1.4k
24-70 f2.8L about 2.3k
The sinful thing about SLR or DSLR, is that there is no "best lens" in terms of focal length. It is highly dependent on individual preferences, as well as the desired shots and perspectives. You get the 135 f2L, you get a certain kind of shots. You get the 24-70 f2.8L, you'll end up using it very differently altogether. If you get 85 f1.2L, you'll still be missing what 24-70 offers and vice versa.
Lastly, I beg to differ, and risk being a public enemy, on the popular notion here on clubsnap: "equipment does not make the pictures, the person behind the camera does"
I personally feel that given a piece of good equipment speeds up learning. My foray
into photography is plagued with confusions on figuring out whether my errors are mistakes I made, or limitations of my camera. Like what was mentioned on other threads, "the best equipment tends to be less forgiving on mistakes." And it was also mentioned here that you would have no more excuse for lousy shots. Put them both together, you actually identify your areas of weakness far more easily. At least that's my experience so far.