its mainly for low light situations... where u need a fast lens and large aperture.. and usually its used for portraits... tho usually the top half only.. but if u wanna get half body, jus haf to move back :D
yeah, that's true, makes me think alot whether to get a N brand or jus stick with a cheaper alternative like tamron which is like 1/4 of N lens.. hahaha.. how about 70-300mm?? the model w/o VR... its actually quite cheap and gives zoom... but on a DX 55-200mm is better right??? hahaha...
hahaha, cool... well what i have in mind is investing in lens which can be used for both dx and fx, cos i'm thinking of gg FF in a few years, so it would be pointless to get DX lens... really appreciated the input here... :D i think i shall probably get the 24-70... =D
hey guys, i was jus wondering how these lens would perform best with a D300... wrt to the original trinity lens and the new trinity lens... all 6 lens are suitable for FX and DX bodies
Original trinity:
AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED
AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8D IF-ED
AF-S VR...