ZS100 vs RX100 IV or waiting for LX200??


The LX200 if what they say in the rumors about fully articulating screen (I doubt the rumors have it right, it'll most likely be an upwards-flipping selfie screen) and built in ND filters are true.

With a 20mp sensor, they are likely to have a full sensor readout for 4k, otherwise it'll be terribly cropped in for 4k video.
 

I will no longer buy a camera for videography if it doesn't have a tiltable LCD. So between ZS100 and RX100, choice is clear if the use is primarily for video. LX series is a strange beast. The heft does not justify the performance limitation imposed by focal range and f-stop. It's bigger than a GM5 with an equivalent lens. IF 4K is not important, GF7 is a better deal for a pocket camera. Currently, holding out for the Nikon Dl1850.
 

Wah, i really "catch no ball" about what u guys just said.

Time for me to go back my cave and do some homework
 

which one you will get?

As a video camera (since you posted this in that section)? None of the above.

As a stills camera with occasional video - wait to see LX200 confirmed specs first. Nothing concrete out yet how to compare... haha.
 

Wow, I read dpreview review about A6300.. Image and video quality, A6300 sharper than both ZS100 and RX100 IV.
 

Image Quality

A6300 vs RX100 IV
i16X4p3.png


A6300 vs ZS100
ZwYEN70.png


A6300 vs A7R II
0qeGCDV.png



Video Quality

A6300 vs RX100 IV
OnbNiFI.png


A6300 vs ZS100
no video for ZS100

A6300 vs A7R II
W3kEhLu.png
 

Last edited:
Back
Top