Hi all, seeking all your expert opinion. I am quite new to photography with a D90 and a M8 with 35 summilux asph ver 1.
I was thinking of getting a D700 with the coming 35mm f1.4g but with the fund and if i sold the M8, i could get a M9 body. Reason I thot of D700 is for the full frame, shorter min focal distance photography (not macro) and shooting my fast moving 1 year old daughter. But I mostly like the M8 for the way the 35mm summilux renders the photos and less post-processing needed. When my daughter grows up and "more cooperative" I would most likely use my M8.
I keep going in circles when i cannot take close up photography but prefer ff quality and shallow depth of field. Also, I saw photos taken by the M9 and was blown away. Though not sure if its due to the noctilux but the 100% crop shows amazing details!
Thot maybe someone might have been in the same situation before and I could hear your experience. Thanks for any comments.
I was thinking of getting a D700 with the coming 35mm f1.4g but with the fund and if i sold the M8, i could get a M9 body. Reason I thot of D700 is for the full frame, shorter min focal distance photography (not macro) and shooting my fast moving 1 year old daughter. But I mostly like the M8 for the way the 35mm summilux renders the photos and less post-processing needed. When my daughter grows up and "more cooperative" I would most likely use my M8.
I keep going in circles when i cannot take close up photography but prefer ff quality and shallow depth of field. Also, I saw photos taken by the M9 and was blown away. Though not sure if its due to the noctilux but the 100% crop shows amazing details!
Thot maybe someone might have been in the same situation before and I could hear your experience. Thanks for any comments.