17-50 or 28-75?
28-75 got a aperture ring... but iirc i nv saw one on my frend 17-50(guess becos it was meant for fully digital..
28-75.. i want to use on FM2 as well.. so no pt buy 17-50.. for me at least.. thanks for info!!!

17-50 or 28-75?
28-75 got a aperture ring... but iirc i nv saw one on my frend 17-50(guess becos it was meant for fully digital..
I usually use f4... Seldom want to use aperature larger than that because I think it looks too soft at wide aperature...
I thought this lens was known to be sharp wide open. Like, really sharp.
Mine is on its way to Japan now.
Mine is on its way to Japan now.
wat happen? vacation? ;p
Now at Japan for servicing. :sweat:
i happened to see your other thread.. it's softer at 28mm f2.8 only or at all focal lengths?
so bad you have to send it in? :dunno:
Yes, even e guy at e tamron service centre cant fix it. :sweat:
venom81, your lens back yet? or don't want come back already? ;p
Yah, its back a few days ago. Do did u get e lens?
oh.. so tts 3 weeks? hows it now? is the maintenance satisfactory? :think:
yeah i did. got any issues anot? mine has some dust particles inside, hoping if i send in they can remove it.
oh, if u wan compare pix wide open just post or pm me. i'll try shoot the equivalent and reply u. =)
Aiyah, every lens has a bit of dust inside, even Canon Ls.