tamron 28-75 f2.8


Status
Not open for further replies.
17-50 or 28-75?
28-75 got a aperture ring... but iirc i nv saw one on my frend 17-50(guess becos it was meant for fully digital..

28-75.. i want to use on FM2 as well.. so no pt buy 17-50.. for me at least.. thanks for info!!! :D
 

I usually use f4... Seldom want to use aperature larger than that because I think it looks too soft at wide aperature...
 

I usually use f4... Seldom want to use aperature larger than that because I think it looks too soft at wide aperature...

I thought this lens was known to be sharp wide open. Like, really sharp.
 

A pity it wasn't wider by 4mm. This lens would've been on my wishlist, had it been a 24-75, or 24-85 even. Tamron lenses :thumbsup: than Sigma lenses IMHO.
 

Mine is on its way to Japan now.
 

Now at Japan for servicing. :sweat:

i happened to see your other thread.. it's softer at 28mm f2.8 only or at all focal lengths?
so bad you have to send it in? :dunno:
 

Mine has overexposure issue with flash in iTTL-BL mode.
 

i happened to see your other thread.. it's softer at 28mm f2.8 only or at all focal lengths?
so bad you have to send it in? :dunno:

Yes, even e guy at e tamron service centre cant fix it. :sweat:
 

yeah i did. got any issues anot? mine has some dust particles inside, hoping if i send in they can remove it.

oh, if u wan compare pix wide open just post or pm me. i'll try shoot the equivalent and reply u. =)
 

Just send in if still under warranty. ;)
 

yeah i did. got any issues anot? mine has some dust particles inside, hoping if i send in they can remove it.

oh, if u wan compare pix wide open just post or pm me. i'll try shoot the equivalent and reply u. =)

Aiyah, every lens has a bit of dust inside, even Canon Ls.
 

Aiyah, every lens has a bit of dust inside, even Canon Ls.

i know. read somewhere that dust in lens can create flare, right? will be watching out for it.
if under warranty, will the service centre remove the dust particles?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top