most third party macro lenses are excellent choices, some even better than first party ones. i won't really worry too much, just do the standard in shop tests, wide open, f/8, f/11, look at corner, look at center, etc. some reading up on how to do this will save you a lot of trouble in case you get a soft copy - but this is hardly ever a problem for macro lenses.
Yeah, I would definitely do a quick check on the lens when I do get it. I'm actually slightly torn between the Sigma 150mm and the Nikkor 105 because I think VR will very useful. :dunno:
how big? technically - unlimited. so long as whoever does it knows what he's doing. the current state of technology today is pretty impressive. so the question is, what sort of sizes are you looking at?
I do a bit of poster design in school and we usually print at A3 and above...

printing is a different ballgame from viewing on screen i think. of course, if you print big big and then you go in close close to look, then different story. have you looked at those really huge posters close up?![]()
Hmmm I haven't actually seen them close-up... hehe. Are you saying that those pictures will look not as good when seen up close?
well taken 10mp can do A2 decently and more.
Hi psychobiologist, thanks for the reply! Just wondering, can the photos I've shown there considered "well taken" enough for A2 printing? I may want to use some pictures (but not the ones here la) for poster printing sometime so I'm a little concerned. :think:
They all look pretty good to me. If you want anything better you probably got to spend a whole lot more on exotic lenses.
Exotic lenses... Does that include those like the Zeiss Planar ZF T* 50mm f1/4? :sweatsm: