Need a little help with the pano...


Status
Not open for further replies.

TME

Senior Member
This pano that I am posting consists of 23 shots taken vertically over 360 degrees... I know it's a bit of overkill.... I forgot to average out the metering and so I am getting lines and different exposures... anyone can help me with the pic?

I am posting a rather small picture so it's not very sharp... I realise I also forgot to save the original processed bitmap file... haiz... all I am left with after like 1 hour of postprocessing the original stitched file is this 750KB bmp /jpeg file...

Please critique and if u can help, I'll find a way to send the file to u... it's 184MB... :) Thanks!

pano_small_copy.jpg
 

do you have the original 23 files? if you do, send them to me, i give it a shot... no promises...
 

dr34mc4st3r said:
try this?

http://www.arcsoft.com/products/panoramamaker/

it helps in adjusting exposure automatically


I have panorama factory which allows lots of adjustments from fully auto to fully manual... I had to stitch manually cos my focal length was 17mm (25.5mm equiv.)... I decided that I cannot trust the auto exposure function if I did not average out the metering... the difference was about 2 or more stops between the shade and sky...
 

http://www.filefactory.com/?fbf34a

The file is uploaded at the above URL. It's a WinRAR file archive comprising of 23 jpegs at 6.1MP each. The archive is 111MB in size.

Thanks!
 

don't happen to have the raw files do u? :P

was adjusting the exposure, and realised that if i appy the adjustment equally, the sky matches but the field doesn't, or vice-versa. will try to do with a curve when i have more time.
 

pai said:
don't happen to have the raw files do u? :P

was adjusting the exposure, and realised that if i appy the adjustment equally, the sky matches but the field doesn't, or vice-versa. will try to do with a curve when i have more time.


I dun shoot in raw unfortunately... and that's also fortunate for me cos the 7D produces such fantastic colour and exposure out of the camera most of the time...
Is there any software where u can do a leveling of exposure of all photos referenced to one of the photos?
 

panotry.jpg


testing... testing...
 

hmm, i tried to post a resized-save-for-web picture that was only 400+kb, but photobucket downsized it anyway. grrr.

anyway i've tried to fix the uneven exposure and stitching line problem, can u see from this small pic whether it's ok? pm me your email and i can send a slightly larger one. no point sending full-sized unless you're happy with the result.

sorry, the sky is mostly blown... the shady area is actually more than 4 stops below the brighter part of the scene. also didn't do any sharpening or what, the picture is soft now, but it sharpens up nicely.

also, there is some ghosting, where the images don't quite match, esp because one of the ppl in the picture moved between shots. that can probably be fixed too, but it'll take more time.

sorry this has taken so long, but the stitched files are really huge, and my computer is not very speedy. it's far from perfect, but i hope it goes some ways towards making up for the big range of different exposure settings in the original.
 

What can I say?! WOAH!!!! That's a great job given the extremes in exposures... I know the lighting in the canteen and the sky was really huge difference... I expcted it to be blown anyway... on most of my shots, the sky is just one white mass cos of the 4-6 stops of difference between indoors and outdoors... never mind the ghosting... that's ok cos the people were moving about... how long did you take? And what did you do? Please teach.... :)

Anyway, please email the file to me at mingern@singnet.com.sg and teome@hc.edu.sg. The latter address should be able to take the full sized file... the file should be in excess of 100MB I guess... I love it!

THANK YOU!!!

P.S... now to find some lab that will print a pano for me...
 

oops haha, suddenly realise that even if your email can tahan, i also cannot send that big a file. i'm uploading to yousendit.com now

the small file looks ok, but i think the big file still needs a bit of post-processing. i think you'd probably prefer to do it yourself, so i just pass you the tiff. i think need to apply a slight reverse-S-shape curve to reduce the contrast a little more, plus some shadow highlight to recover details in the darker part of the picture. and of course, will need to sharpen before you print. also have to crop away the top and bottom.

er hehe actually i just anyhow whack one:

the first things i did were to look at the exif and to run the pictures thru panorama factory. from the exif you can see that the shutter speeds fall roughly into three groups. the pix on the right are around 1/500 to 1/640. the ones in the middle are about 1/200 to 1/250. the ones on the left (shaded part) are about 1/80 to 1/100. the trial stitching showed that the transitions were ok within these sections, but when stitching a 1/640 frame to a 1/200 one (larger than 1 stop difference), the stitch lines could be seen.

so next part quite obvious lah. i took the middle exposure as correct, opened a 1/640 shot side by side with the 1/250 one that it was supposed to be stitched with. then i applied a curve layer to the 1/640 shot and tweaked the curve until the joining parts looked as similar in exposure as possible. save the curve, then apply it to all the right side pix. then do the same or a 1/200 and 1/100 shot - create a new curve to match two shots, then save and apply to all the others. actually for the best results i should have made a curve for every single different shutter speed. but er... i lazy lah.

(if we had the raw files, even easier, just process all of them the same way, but use the exposure slider to reverse any difference in exposure.)

so now that we have a set of files all roughly the same exposure, run it thru pano factory again, and get the final file. i was really too lazy to place all the stitch points, so i ran it on fully auto stitching (with the exposure compensation and correction settings off). if you want to give it a try, and would like better results than what i've produced, you can:

a) do a more refined exposure compensation for the individual pix, especially the part in the shade
b) do semi-auto or manual stitching in pano factory, to reduce ghosting and improve alignment

sorry, hope that was clear and not too longwinded.

as for printing the pano... i have no idea man. depends on how big you wanna print. if you create a giant file and stack 3 of these one on top of the other, you can print it 12x18, then cut, and get three panos, each 4 inches high on the short side, for maybe about $10 total?

if you want it any bigger, hehe try to find someone with a big pro inkjet that uses roll paper?

hmm type so much, the file still loading. will pm you the download address when done. good luck, really hope it turns out well.
 

Thanks for the tips... so u need to do manual individual exposure compensation for each shot in PS... I left it all to the pano factory although I did manual stitching... I left the exposure compensation in... what focal length did u dial in?

I cropped sharpened the file slightly (50%, 5 pixels, 3 levels) and it looks great (for the terrible original exposure range). Much better than churned out from the auto function...

Anyway, the shots were taken at 17mm using the KM 17-35 on a 7D... pretty cool huh? 23 shot pano using an ultra wide... the lens distortion is not too bad considering the focal length... I'm quite pleased with what u came up with! Thanks again!
 

no problem

focal length, i tried it with the auto-detect, and it got something near 17mm, so i thought it was accurate enough, since even if a lens is set at 17mm the actual focal length might vary slightly depending on focus point etc.

hehe yeah, that's one big big pano man... resulting image is 40-50 megapixels, 360 degrees...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top