My first glamor shots


Status
Not open for further replies.
zcf said:
sometime I even shot at ISO 800 :sweat: , depend on lighting condition.

Noise is not a problem until ISO 800.. ISO1600 noise if visible but still pretty darn good though...

However, you need to make sure you don't under expose the shot then you are ok with 1600ISO.


Hart
 

Agetan said:
70-210 f4 is very sharp with flash or not...

Here is the sample..

1/10sec f4.0 @ iso800 no flash, handheld AS on

1/8sec f4.0 @iso800 w/flash handheld AS on

Hart

Here is another sample taken by the 70-210 during the same event. The subject was not moving that much and this shot is sharp.

PICT6105.jpg


This shot is taken using the following :-

Exposure program manual, 1/90s, F4, ISO 200 and 130mm. I was thinking that those other shots which are not so sharp are caused by following the models with the camera when they are strutting along the run way. When they are stationery, the shots turn out OK. Perhaps increasing the ISO when following moving subjects next time will help.
 

Agetan said:
70-210 f4 is very sharp with flash or not...

Hart
Your shots were spot on. Just want to know. You have the 70-200SSM right, can you test it with your 70-210/4 at same aperture and subject if the shuttle speed is different? My set show some different on certain time. I can't test my as I sold it 2+ years ago.
 

Hi,

If you are using 70-210 f4 and 70-200 f2.8 SSM, there will be no different in exposure if you shoot at the same aperture...

If you find any differences in the exposure, you might be metered it wrongly. If you are using the honeycomb metering, it will change with some changes to the lighting condition.

Technically it is impossible to have different exposure with any lens (providing the same focal length) at the same aperture and light is constant. If you are going to test, you need to test it at control environment. Only vary 1 variable at a time.

If you search the forum for "my nephew" and "agetan", you can see the shots comparing the f2.8 SSM and f4. They are as sharp both at f4, based on my copy though.

Now, anyone want my f4.0 version? hahaa... selling it soon as I might get another SSM soon...

Hart
 

Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.

138842883_378aba7976_o.jpg


138842827_fc90bdbc00_o.jpg


138843166_6e461ee3ca_o.jpg


All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.
 

dynaxattack said:
Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.


All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.
swee!:thumbsup:
 

Nice shot...like the #1 one, nice b&w contrast. :thumbsup:

dynaxattack said:
Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.

138842883_378aba7976_o.jpg


All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.
 

dynaxattack said:
Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.

All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.

Yr shots are good. :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: They are really sharp. Will use yr settings next time. Did u use the flash or do any post processing?
 

Thx guys, glad you like'em ;). Still far trying to catch the right WB. Hope it doesnt bothers you too much. ;)

leeshock said:
Did u use the flash or do any post processing?

No flash No PP, just resized. :)
 

dynaxattack said:
Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.

138842883_378aba7976_o.jpg



All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.

This is what it should be!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Hart
 

dynaxattack said:
Since you are talking bout the F/4 beercan and model shots. I hope you dont mind if i tumpang a few.

138842883_378aba7976_o.jpg


138842827_fc90bdbc00_o.jpg


138843166_6e461ee3ca_o.jpg


All taken with KM5D, Av, CAF, Centre-Meter, ISO800 (non-flash), F/4, speed varies. I think this beercan is just sweet. Dont you think so?? :lovegrin:

This is the first time i relied fully on the CAF Multi-zone focusing. Accuracy is sweet with almost 95% spot on. Metering is reliable too.

1st shot is very nice, very striking image of a curvy lady in flowy red against the bokeh of the muted colours and graphical background... You got a very good spot to take this fashion show. I gave up taking this kind due to too many people fighting for a good spot. A touch of fill flash would be better to brighten up her eye sockets. The other 2 do need a little fill flash due to the very harsh shadows on their face. I love the beercan too that I got 2! Sold one away to reno77 though due to not enough space in the drybox, haha!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top