Minolta Dynmax 7 any comments?

[RKP]

Hi, has anybody tried or using the Minolta Dynmax 7? THinking of buying, just wondering what you guys/gals think of the camera? Your comments would be much apreciated. Thanks

 

[andylee]

Hi, has anybody tried or using the Minolta Dynmax 7? THinking of buying, just wondering what you guys/gals think of the camera? Your comments would be much apreciated. Thanks

It's call Dynax 7. Great camera, metering damm accurate.easy to access compensation dial.not so heavy.got ADI flash metering.focusing is fast(at least enough for me) BTW, some people also call it Dynamite 7---> serious. :bsmilie:

joke lah...

 

[RKP]

How does the Dynax 7 compare with the Nikon F75? And what is its similar model compared to Canon, help would be much appreciated. thanks

 

[YuHsuan]

Comparison of the Dynax 7 to the F75? With all due respect to the Nikon users here, if you are comparing body vs body, there is NO comparison. I would say even the Dynax 5 is a slightly better camera, let alone the Dynax 7.

The approximate equivalent of the Dynax 7 is the Nikon F100. The Canon equivalent is the EOS 3. However, both the Nikon and the Canon have certain features that the Dynax 7 does not.

See:
http://www.photozone.de/bindex2.html

Look under camera features overview and see the specs yourself.

How does the Dynax 7 compare with the Nikon F75? And what is its similar model compared to Canon, help would be much appreciated. thanks

 

[pgk]

Hi, has anybody tried or using the Minolta Dynmax 7? THinking of buying, just wondering what you guys/gals think of the camera? Your comments would be much apreciated. Thanks

Absolutely wonderful camera. In my humble opinion, the best non-professional 35mm SLR in the world. Compare feature-for-feature with Nikons and Canons of the same level - the Dynax 7 simply blows them all away. I have used several Nikon & Canon amateur bodys and there is NO COMPARISON in terms of ergonomics and performance between these and 'The 7'. The nearest Nikon equivalent is F100 which costs almost double the price of the 7. Still, the F100 does not have the mirror lockup that the 7 has.

The flash system - with a reasonably priced external flash unit - can synchronise upto the maximum shutter speed of the camera - ie 1/8000. That of the F100 is 1/250 or so. Auto focus is faster than any Nikon or Canon I have used. The construction - though plastic - feels very sturdy. The big LCD display can almost display the entire user manual (it is that detailed!). This camera has more features than you will ever need in normal or even extreme photographic situations.

Having said all this, however I have a BIG complaint about Minolta not coming out with a DSLR. This is a really sad situation. For this one reason, I thought of selliing off my Dynax 7 but I cannot get myself to do it - the brain says yes but the heart says no!

If you are OK staying with film for sometime to come, go get a Dynax 7 and you will never regret the decision.

 

[sulhan]

Hie there....

I am using one myself. During the last session, i think i did not take out from the bag to show you as i did not want to shower the lesson with equipments.

Its a great camera......not much publicity here in Singapore.....but in the UK...its one of those pride of Minolta users nxt in line withthe Dynax 9 as its has accurate metering. Its LCD at the back really helps you to study the 14segmant metering and understand each photos expected output.

Its ability to store 7 rolls of film shooting info is great for shots study.

Go for it if you really one a great cam. Its a camera that Minolta probably designed and put all the neccessary sensible features into a film camera.

BUT....one thing ot take note is that it does not come with any "preset icons".....like the "portrait","landscape","nightshot" etc....however there are self presettable position in the knob based on your personal concoction...of aperture,shuttter,flash exposure,EV compensation,

Well......have fun....

regard,
me

Reagrds,
Sulhan

 

[dannynys]

You are talking about the pride of Minolta users here. There is no comparsion what so ever. It is here to stay for good. I really don't know what else to add to make it even better, perhaps a digital version? Well, if you are new to the world of cameras. I would say that the main brands that are out to the market are comparable. The other consideration you might want to do is to see what does the entire system offer you. For example, like the lens varieties and additional accessories like the flashs. However, be advise that if you are starting with this brand, my advise is to stay with this brand. It is expensive to switch brands later. But be warn that Minolta has not offer any digital SLR yet, so if have plans to move to digital, you might want to consider this point.

Cheers,
Danny :bsmilie:

 

[deslim27]

Its the pride of Minolta (and me...kekeke), nothing from other manufacturers has come close since I bought it more than 2 1/2 years ago. (same price range lah)

My complaint? Its mirror slapping is a bit too loud, but not a problem at all to me.

Some people complain about its build (plastic), I've never worries that its break or fail due to my applications, and I've ever use it in the light rain (*phew*, it still working perfectly).

I don't think I will ever sell it, even if I will ever own a Dynax 7 equiv DSLR.

* PS : Remember to go along with VC-7 grip for the fullest pleasure.. kekek

 

[Zerstorer]

Notice that you are selling off an entire F75 kit. What aspect of the F75 do you find lacking that you wish to get in the Dynax 7?

 

[forbytes]

What aspect of the F75 do you find lacking that you wish to get in the Dynax 7?

How about the glasses. :thumbsup: :blah: :thumbsup:

 

[TME]

How about the glasses. :thumbsup: :blah: :thumbsup:

Notti notti! No fair!

 

[deslim27]

How about the glasses. :thumbsup: :blah: :thumbsup:

your point is? :think:

 

[forbytes]

It was mentioned that the change in system can be due to the lack of certain features in the camera. When someone is thinking of getting/changing a system, he/she not only look at the specs of the camera body but also the accessories and lens that comes with it. This is a sensitive question whether M or N is better. I am going to leave it to individual to decide for him/herself.

M produces some of the finest lens around. M 'G' lens are also more expansive than C or N, especially with the introduction of the SSM lens.

To sum up, things to consider when getting a new camera are
1) body specs, weight, frame rate, etc
2) accessories, including lens and flash
3) etc...

So lens quality can be one of the many reasons why people change system. No offence to any other system users.

 

[frisky]

I don't use G lens, but my personal experience on Minolta lens is that I have to spend only a small fraction of what C & N users do..........

 

[deslim27]

IMO, M's body is feature/quality is definitely above N & C (again, same price range lah). And M's has a very impressive flash technology. The only con to me is definitely the variety of lens available. No problem for me, there is always cheaper 3rd party lens around for me. My main workhorses are 50 f/1.7 and 100 f/2.8.. lesser usage on zoom lens nowadays..

 

[forbytes]

agreed with deslim27 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

 

[Zerstorer]

IMO, M's body is feature/quality is definitely above N & C (again, same price range lah). And M's has a very impressive flash technology. The only con to me is definitely the variety of lens available. No problem for me, there is always cheaper 3rd party lens around for me. My main workhorses are 50 f/1.7 and 100 f/2.8.. lesser usage on zoom lens nowadays..

No doubt that Minolta builds the best bodies at each price point. Taking into consideration the lens system is certainly important to any serious photographer, this aspect is however wide open to debate.

However, I observe that the original poster didn't state the reasons for changing and no one bothered to ask why he was changing systems. To see someone comparing a F75 to a Dynax 7 gives an indication of the familiarity of the enquirer to either system.

Hence I find that making unreserved recommendations without further questioning might not be the best approach.

 

[deslim27]

Hence I find that making unreserved recommendations without further questioning might not be the best approach.

I've to respect your sincere and responsible handling of this post. :thumbsup:

RKP, can provide more info on your specific application and the reason for changing system?

 

[sulhan]

Hmm.....

I think he was looking for a camera that allows him to do DOF preview on the fly....i.e press DOF preview button + scrolll the knob to the different apertures. As this was one major difference i guess....

(the follwing was based on my personal try on the F75...i may be wrong)

For the F75 i think its ...Set Aperture->Press DOF->Release DOF ->Set new aperture->Press DOF->Release DOF ->.......

Hmm....maybe i'm wrong.....lets here from him...


regards,
me

 

[RKP]

Yes you are right Sulhan, also what i like about the Dynax 7 is that it stores data for 7 rolls of film so that it helps me to study, where i went right and where i went wrong, I just bought Dynax 7 2nd hand selling off my F75 today, and am really happy with it. Alot more funcitonality which allows me to learn more. Guys your comments have really been helpful. Many thanks