I found one at a second handshop in mint (70-210 f3.5-4.5) and I loan it out to get some pics. I am no expert as I never used AF camera before and i think it was fast. However the only thing that annoyed me is the rotating front element. I have to readjust the filter everytime I focus.
As for the 100-200, I got a friend who is willing to let it go becuase he got a lot of lens which his wife is 'forcing' him to get rid of some.
70-210 f4.... I havn;t seen one at the moment but there was one 2 weeks ago but was sole in 2 days.
I dont know how good is the G lens but form their pricing, I think the cost must justified something or else Minolta will get a spanking.
G lens is very good and worth its price.
70-210/3.5-4.5 is not different 70-210/3.5-5.6. It is a good old lens and some reviews think that it is better than 70-210/4.
Even its second-hand price is a bit higher than 70-210/4 in Hong Kong.
Originally posted by geoffery As for the 100-200, I got a friend who is willing to let it go becuase he got a lot of lens which his wife is 'forcing' him to get rid of some.
Anyone with these three lenses? Or at least the 100-200/4.5 and 70-210/3.5-4.5? "Which lens is better?" has always been inconclusive, due to lack of direct side-by-side comparison.
I would be interested to do a newspaper test, together with the 70-210/4 (I have this lens). Anyone willing to lend me these lenses for a few days?