tomcat
Senior Member
That's just my point.
The 70-200mm would be a useful remedy in such a non-ideal situation. Ideally, we should get closer to the mountains to get a better view but most of the time if we are on a packaged tour, we just can't go off-track as and when we wish.
But when we reached those scenic attractions that's in our itinerary, the 70-200mm would be practically useless because everything in front of us is best covered with a wide and ultra-wide lens.
So the best is to have all 3 lenses to cover every scenario on a tour but even then, ultimately most of us would probably end up with at least 95% of the shots taken with the wide and ultra-wide lenses any way... unless your speciality is to take those kind of shots with the 70-200mm in any situation. That's my experience anyway.
The 70-200mm would be a useful remedy in such a non-ideal situation. Ideally, we should get closer to the mountains to get a better view but most of the time if we are on a packaged tour, we just can't go off-track as and when we wish.
But when we reached those scenic attractions that's in our itinerary, the 70-200mm would be practically useless because everything in front of us is best covered with a wide and ultra-wide lens.
So the best is to have all 3 lenses to cover every scenario on a tour but even then, ultimately most of us would probably end up with at least 95% of the shots taken with the wide and ultra-wide lenses any way... unless your speciality is to take those kind of shots with the 70-200mm in any situation. That's my experience anyway.
