D dr34mc4st3r Senior Member Jul 1, 2006 #21 no worries all my lenses all focuses abt the same speed :bsmilie:
tankm Senior Member Jul 3, 2006 #22 As long as don't try competitor "C" USM and "N" HSM or Minolta SSM, then nothing to compare with. :bsmilie: GENO said: its a good lens if u can tahan the speed .. :bsmilie: Click to expand...
As long as don't try competitor "C" USM and "N" HSM or Minolta SSM, then nothing to compare with. :bsmilie: GENO said: its a good lens if u can tahan the speed .. :bsmilie: Click to expand...
satay16 Senior Member Jul 3, 2006 #23 if given a choice between sigma 70-200 or the beercan, would the sigma be better?
Z zcf Senior Member Jul 3, 2006 #24 satay16 said: if given a choice between sigma 70-200 or the beercan, would the sigma be better? Click to expand... I think Sigma should be better in speed, sharpness (at f/4) and focus in low light. But beercan is lighter and cheaper. Colour wise not sure who is better, some say beercan colour looks great.
satay16 said: if given a choice between sigma 70-200 or the beercan, would the sigma be better? Click to expand... I think Sigma should be better in speed, sharpness (at f/4) and focus in low light. But beercan is lighter and cheaper. Colour wise not sure who is better, some say beercan colour looks great.