Ever heard of a sub $700 HD 720P camera?


Status
Not open for further replies.

DXNMedia

Moderator
Staff member
Well, the following camera that I'm going to review is simply amazing to me as a video professional who always demand a high level of video acquisition standards.

Have a look at this short demo reel that I've created simply because I think this camera has got HUGE potential as the smallest HD capable camera with decent image quality.

http://www.dxnmedia.net/CanonTX1Demo.mov

At a price tag of below S$700, you cannot ask for much, but if we go back 10-20 years into the era of amatuer film making with Super8 & 8mm films, I can do no more than praise this little bugger.

My comparison of this camera is of course, not in the league of full HD or HDV cameras, but as a 'super8' alternative in this HD era that can be used as an acquisition tool even for professional applications.

Some features:-
- It's designed as a compact digital still cam.
- 1280x720 HD video capture capability
- Unfortunately it's only at 30fps.

But hey, if we compare to the Super8 era, u've got fixed frame rate & resolution too!
So you've gotta learn to deal with it. :)


Pros:-
- Extremely small & compact
- records 13mins of 1280x720 video with 4gb SDHC card. (even with a roll of negs on super8, you're limited to about 10mins of footage?) Cannot remember my figures, but a 400ft roll of 16mm neg can shoot for about 10-12 mins only too!. :D


There are plenty of bad areas from this nifty little toy if we're comparing to a full HDV camera, but hey at S$700 and the compact size?!!? Don't ask for much.

Cons:-
- There are noticible compression artifacts, but can deal with it.
- Irritating vertical smears when filming a light source!!! (Reminds of me the good old IT CCD days, and some of the old tube camera characteristics.)
- Lag in auto-focus, no manual focus
- Very grainy in low light conditions (but it has a unique look!)
- Lack of manual control in iris/gain
- No manual shutter control
- Lost of details in pans & motions (Perhaps turning off IS will improve it.)
- No external audio input. (but hey, Super8 films are also a big lagging behind in audio capture with optical sound)
- Highlights are a bit oversaturated, but this is the typical look of Canon Digix processors.

Again, if we compare this camera to the era of Super8 days, we cannot ask for more!
Super8 doesn't perform well in low light conditions even with a ASA400 film stock!
This camera will train you well to get your basics of lighting right! Light properly if you complain about grains!


Last but not least, I must say that for the price, the size & for the decent image quality it can produce despite some constraints, this is a freaking good cam that I'd recommend for all video enthusiast going into the HD era.

I've never praised a Canon product before, and damn I must admit that I'm raving at this camera. Even for me as a video professional, I swear that this cam will be with me all the time for my acquisition, test shots & backup needs!!!

If Canon wanna sponsor (are you hearing?), I'll be making a short film totally with TX1 in the near future!

:bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
I've created a yahoo group forum for any future TX1 Alternative HD Filmmakers.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TX1_SGFilmmaking

Drop me an email if you wanna join this group where i'll share tips, acquisition techniques & post production workarounds for your future alternative HD filmmaking productions. :thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

- records 13mins of 1280x720 video with 4gb SDHC card. (even with a roll of negs on super8, you're limited to about 10mins of footage?) Cannot remember my figures, but a 100ft roll of 16mm neg can shoot for about 10-12 mins only too!. :D

Does the SDHC have to be a fast one? What's the minimum class required to be able to capture 720p video? Ie. Can one buy/use cheap 4gb SDs or must one get the more expensive higher speed ones? Does look very promising though.
 

Check out the HV20 by canon as well. Great value for money cam too!
 

Yes, it is recommended to use a fast SDHC card, preferably class 6.
At highest resolution 720p capture, the unit requires a fast write time.


Malcolm, no doubts that HDV can give you a better image quality, but i think it is unfair to compare a tape based, MPEG2 (HDV) camera with this sub S$700 cam with 'P2' or 'XDCAM EX' type of acquisition format with a moderately compressed Motion JPEG capture.

My Sony Z1 costed me close to $8k, whereas this little TX1 costs me a fraction of the cost at $700, even the HV20 costs close to $1.8k?

The point of my post is for alternative HD filmmaking, and for this price, this size & image quality, I guess nothing else can beat this cam until some manufacturers come up with something more promising...

If there are further complains about the technical constraints of the cam, then I'd have 2 simple advise:
- Get a better camera and don't complain. :)
- Brush up on your basics of filming skills. :)


If I have a wishlist for a better cam like this (Cheap, card storage + small form factor), I'd hope for:
- Better camera section with a more versatile manual control
- Selection/choice of using lesser compression rate. (intraframe based, and not GOP)
- 3CCD/CMOS

Basically a consumer & affordable version of XDCAM EX or HVX-202 P2 styled camera with no propeitary compression algorithm.
But at this moment nothing can beat this TX1's capability & size factor. :thumbsup:
 

Heh actually i was going based on the assumption that this segment was for 'cheap and good'. The HV20 is extremely cheap, and delivers a stunning image. Not to mention its true 24p shooting capabilities. I only know the US price of it, but i know its sub US$1000. It also has passable manual controls, and when compared to any other prosumer camera, it has more or less equal performance - the manual controls are just inconvenient to use due to its form factor. And if i had bought my camera when the HV20 was released, i'd probably have gone for it instead of my DVX102b, and then bought a nice 35mm adaptor with the money i saved. Unless budget is really a concern, I'd recommend anyone considering the TX1 to cough up the extra cash for the HV20. Just my 2 cents worth on the matter :)
 

Hi Malcolm,

Good advise as well, but putting myself in the shoes of the average consumer and their applications, I doubt I wanna deal with HDV & use tape based editing.

Still gotta go thru painless hours of capturing, recompressing during editing & converting to the delivery format. With this style & quality of acquisition, I'd prefer to shoot, cook up something quick in post production & deliver.

And most of the time, in web-based application (eg. mailing the video clip to family & friends, etc...), you don't need full 1280x720p resolution too, but if you ever need that kind of resolution for professional work, it's still passable (after some treatment to the footage) in my honest opinion.

:thumbsup:


Oh yes, plus you can never beat the compact size of this TX1 too. (Sized like a pack of cigarettes only!)
Ultimately, i guess I like the size, price, decent quality with a compromise & effortless file transfer for post. :D
 

Hi DXN am quite bought over by the quality. Like to know if i were to recompress to DV reslution will it hide the noise/grain any bit?

thanks
ys
Hi Malcolm,

Good advise as well, but putting myself in the shoes of the average consumer and their applications, I doubt I wanna deal with HDV & use tape based editing.

Still gotta go thru painless hours of capturing, recompressing during editing & converting to the delivery format. With this style & quality of acquisition, I'd prefer to shoot, cook up something quick in post production & deliver.

And most of the time, in web-based application (eg. mailing the video clip to family & friends, etc...), you don't need full 1280x720p resolution too, but if you ever need that kind of resolution for professional work, it's still passable (after some treatment to the footage) in my honest opinion.

:thumbsup:


Oh yes, plus you can never beat the compact size of this TX1 too. (Sized like a pack of cigarettes only!)
Ultimately, i guess I like the size, price, decent quality with a compromise & effortless file transfer for post. :D
 

Hi DXN am quite bought over by the quality. Like to know if i were to recompress to DV reslution will it hide the noise/grain any bit?

thanks
ys


It'll be quite acceptable, but do be aware that footage is in 30fps & in 16:9 format.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top