D70 kicks D100 ass, not 300D

[Cash]

Everybody appreciates CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions. Not just some stupid comments scorning the poster.



Just what Avatar has mentioned, this forum is for ALL levels of photography & photographers. If you don't like any of the shots, simple just don't comment, nobody, I repeat NOBODY will say that you're selfish and refuse to share.

Being direct and being rude/crude is totally two different things, seems to me you don't know how to differentiate either. And I think most of us would rather you NOT comment since we won't be taking them for advice but rather just shrug it off.

Surely you can take a hint to know when you're NOT wanted. But this being a public forum, free speech, ahh yes. But senseless, rude, arrogant remarks? Sure, free speech by all means, but don't forget this too means that we have free speech. So if you want us to respect your free speech, by all means, respect ours, pot.




And I don't have a problem with bluntness & directness, I pretty appreciate the way even wolfgang replies and comments on the portraits and stuffs in the galleries. Straight and direct, but not rude and arrogant. Can only say "nice meh?, good meh?" but unable to provide a means of explanation for such remarks are totally uncalled for.

You're not here to please everyone, but you're here to piss everybody else off. If you feel a piece of work is not worth for you, just stay off it.

And while u're at it, why not drop over the Canon subforum and make a big hoo-haa over the 1D MK II? You seem to only target Nikon subforum. Your motives are really unknown.

Liked I said, If I'd liked your pictures earlier on and commented on them why I liked them blah, you would not have said these things now. Why do you keep letting Ego speak on your behalf? I said I didn't like your pictures, not you. WHy are you confusing the 2?

Is "wow, i like because blah blah blah" any different from "boring, because blah blah blah"?



CLEARLY THERE IS! FOR SOME!


strange...

 

[Cash]

Liked I said, If I'd liked your pictures earlier on and commented on them why I liked them blah, you would not have said these things now. Why do you keep letting Ego speak on your behalf? I said I didn't like your pictures, not you. WHy are you confusing the 2?

Is "wow, i like because blah blah blah" any different from "boring, because blah blah blah"?



CLEARLY THERE IS! FOR SOME!


strange...

If a picture is pointless and trivia, what constructive comments are you looking for really? It is pointless and trivia to even discuss these basic concepts with you.

 

[swimcraze]

Yawn.......

 

[espn]

Liked I said, If I'd liked your pictures earlier on and commented on them why I liked them blah, you would not have said these things now. Why do you keep letting Ego speak on your behalf? I said I didn't like your pictures, not you. WHy are you confusing the 2?

And you keep missing my point on the rude and arrogantness of your attitude, you keep thinking that it's right. I never expected anybody to like my shots nor do they have to say it's good. Stop using 'big' words like ego to get your way around my back and try to look good to others whilst trying to deflate mine from there. It's not working, pot.

Similarly, if I complimented your comments and accepted them gracefully, these posts/replies won't have surfaced. I said I didn't like your attitude and arragontness, not you, why are you confusing the two?

Is "wow, i like because blah blah blah" any different from "boring, because blah blah blah"?



CLEARLY THERE IS! FOR SOME!


strange...

Clearly, you don't understand what sacarsm, politeness and constructive is.

 

[espn]

If a picture is pointless and trivia, what constructive comments are you looking for really? It is pointless and trivia to even discuss these basic concepts with you.

And if so, you'd have the right not to comment. I don't think it's pointless, what's pointless in your comments and arragont attitude towards the posters.

Sure you may be a professional darn good, every picture is a keeper. You started off like that? Are you forgetting your roots? You were never a newbie? Wow... we have something that's RARE here in Clubsnap!

If a picture is pointless you'd be better off keeping ur snide remarks and smart-aleck comments to yourself, I'm darn sure everybody else feels the same where.

Basic concepts? HAH! You don't even know what's basic courtesy and politness, pot.

 

[Cash]

And if so, you'd have the right not to comment. I don't think it's pointless, what's pointless in your comments and arragont attitude towards the posters.

Sure you may be a professional darn good, every picture is a keeper. You started off like that? Are you forgetting your roots? You were never a newbie? Wow... we have something that's RARE here in Clubsnap!

If a picture is pointless you'd be better off keeping ur snide remarks and smart-aleck comments to yourself, I'm darn sure everybody else feels the same where.

Basic concepts? HAH! You don't even know what's basic courtesy and politness, pot.

If name calling and getting all heated up is all you do when the truth has sunk in, go ahead and indulge yourself in your own ramblings. I sure hope it helps you see better in future.

 

[Cash]

And you keep missing my point on the rude and arrogantness of your attitude, you keep thinking that it's right. I never expected anybody to like my shots nor do they have to say it's good. Stop using 'big' words like ego to get your way around my back and try to look good to others whilst trying to deflate mine from there. It's not working, pot.

Similarly, if I complimented your comments and accepted them gracefully, these posts/replies won't have surfaced. I said I didn't like your attitude and arragontness, not you, why are you confusing the two?



Clearly, you don't understand what sacarsm, politeness and constructive is.

SO you are saying, if I'd said :" Gee, nice set of images...blah" then at your pictures, I would be considered polite then? SO it's ok if at the back of you and offline I still thought your pictures had no life and content-less? Are you saying that? That you want people to be nice online but not the truths?

Why don't you say so when you loaded up those pictures for comment then? Put it in bold caps.


real funny way to learn....

 

[espn]

If name calling and getting all heated up is all you do when the truth has sunk in, go ahead and indulge yourself in your own ramblings. I sure hope it helps you see better in future.

Name what name? Ur ego acting or something?

Sure, now you've nothing to say... and indulge still in your almighty arragontness and hypothetical skills in twisting and turning the means of others against theirs.

I don't know what you're aiming at achieving, but if it helps your ego... go ahead. Just stay out of mine.

 

[espn]

SO you are saying, if I'd said :" Gee, nice set of images...blah" then at your pictures, I would be considered polite then? SO it's ok if at the back of you and offline I still thought your pictures had no life and content-less? Are you saying that? That you want people to be nice online but not the truths?

Why don't you say so when you loaded up those pictures for comment then? Put it in bold caps.


real funny way to learn....

I think u still missed the point. I never expected you to applause "WOW GREAT SHOTS!" Like I said, you still missed the meaning of sacarsm and politeness. If it's not nice, just say it and give some constructive comments and not some rude, smart-aleck answers.

Being polite and being two-faced sacarstic fella here, is totally different. You're neither.

Anybody is welcome to criticsize my shots. Read my posts, when I ask for them, they always appear on the top of my threads, when I don't, I never post any such messages at the thread. But oh well people are still commenting and I accept them gracefully as long as they put it nicely across. I don't think anybody around here likes to read arrogant remarks and smart-aleck 'praises'.

And you can ask around, I'd take anything HARSH as long as it's constructive. Drill that in your head as you keep thinking I'm not open to criticsm.

Real funny that you can appreciate good works and comment on bad works but yet fail to read english. :dunno:

 

[sprockett]

I think u still missed the point. I never expected you to applause "WOW GREAT SHOTS!" Like I said, you still missed the meaning of sacarsm and politeness. If it's not nice, just say it and give some constructive comments and not some rude, smart-aleck answers.

Being polite and being two-faced sacarstic fella here, is totally different. You're neither.

Anybody is welcome to criticsize my shots. Read my posts, when I ask for them, they always appear on the top of my threads, when I don't, I never post any such messages at the thread. But oh well people are still commenting and I accept them gracefully as long as they put it nicely across. I don't think anybody around here likes to read arrogant remarks and smart-aleck 'praises'.

And you can ask around, I'd take anything HARSH as long as it's constructive. Drill that in your head as you keep thinking I'm not open to criticsm.

Real funny that you can appreciate good works and comment on bad works but yet fail to read english. :dunno:

hi espn, i think it is the ex admin....

 

[zaren]

who's the ex admin? :dunno:

 

[SianZronG]

he reminds mi of simon from american idol....

 

[Avatar]

Since when am I an elitist? Based on your unfounded assumptions? WHo did I condemned? People whose pictures I don't like? How sad. Is that what you think?

The gear is just a tool, believe it or not. WHy spend time comparing gears when you can spend time discussing how to make your pictures more substantial?

And yes, most of the pictures here don't appeal to me, but so what? You don't have to believe my words, I didn't ask you to. Many others think there are great shooters here. Again, so what? They could be right. Supressing the free flow of views is just an act of eliticism itself.

What are you warning me against anyway? For being honest to myself and speaking my mind?

I am telling you CS is not an elitist forum, I am not quoting that you an elitist either, don't even begin to even assume I will do that.

I had said it before and I will say it again for the last time, name calling will NOT be tolerated here. If you need a reminder, here's your post again :

d70 d100 300d who cares?! The pictures I see on this site don't match the quality of the gears at all. go figure. Geeks.

I am warning you against the above (quoted in red), your actions in other part of the forums are being reviewed too. If I see you doing this again, I will not hesitate to recommend a ban on you. Also, if you feel a need to complain against me, feel free to contact the admins.

... and yes, I am not see through your so called definition of free speech vs what I perceive as trolling and outright insults on fellow members.

Take this as the final warning, there will not be another one.

 

[Cash]

I am telling you CS is not an elitist forum, I am not quoting that you an elitist either, don't even begin to even assume I will do that.

I had said it before and I will say it again for the last time, name calling will NOT be tolerated here. If you need a reminder, here's your post again :



I am warning you against the above (quoted in red), your actions in other part of the forums are being reviewed too. If I see you doing this again, I will not hesitate to recommend a ban on you. Also, if you feel a need to complain against me, feel free to contact the admins.

... and yes, I am not see through your so called definition of free speech vs what I perceive as trolling and outright insults on fellow members.

Take this as the final warning, there will not be another one.

Besides using the word Geeks(which is in definition one who plays with gadgets), what other insults did I make?

Just need to clarify this with you. Is calling a photo content-less an insult in your book? And what other name calling have I done and directed at which member of this forum? Kindly provide some evidence of it.

 

[Azure]

Besides using the word Geeks(which is in definition one who plays with gadgets), what other insults did I make?

Just need to clarify this with you. Is calling a photo content-less an insult in your book?

Whoever, whatever you are, please be more proactive when you post comments. And show some respect for the moderators of this forum at the least.

 

[Cash]

Besides using the word Geeks(which is in definition one who plays with gadgets), what other insults did I make?

Just need to clarify this with you. Is calling a photo content-less an insult in your book? And what other name calling have I done and directed at which member of this forum? Kindly provide some evidence of it.

By calling me a troll, including yourself and others on assumption, you have already called me names in public. And that amounts to defamation in my book.

 

[Ian]

This thread is now closed and the good posts have been split off to a new thread.

Ian
Moderator
Nikon Forum