Critique format

[Joywalker]

I wrote this in Kopitiam and I thought maybe I should post here too.

I was thinking maybe if we could standardise the format of critique,then it will be more constructive and helpful for newbies like me.

So far,I could only come up something like this.Maybe someone can polish it up:

What is good about the pic -(your comments)
How else can it be better/improved -(your comments)


This way, there will be both +ve and constructive comments in each critique and this will encourage both people- the commenters to word their words carefully and letting the posters know that their pictures are not totally worthless.They would be more motivated and likely,wish to improve their skills by working on those specific comments/methods in the critiques.

Hope this helps the critique system here!

 

[togu]

Originally posted by Joywalker
I wrote this in Kopitiam and I thought maybe I should post here too.

I was thinking maybe if we could standardise the format of critique,then it will be more constructive and helpful for newbies like me.

So far,I could only come up something like this.Maybe someone can polish it up:

What is good about the pic -(your comments)
How else can it be better/improved -(your comments)


This way, there will be both +ve and constructive comments in each critique and this will encourage both people- the commenters to word their words carefully and letting the posters know that their pictures are not totally worthless.They would be more motivated and likely,wish to improve their skills by working on those specific comments/methods in the critiques.

Hope this helps the critique system here!

Sounds good, but...

...It can only be standardise when the "pros" spends their time on the critiques instead of asking "why there's no critiques blah blah"

:devil:

 

[Joywalker]

sad but true.
then how?

Maybe we can set up a critique committee?
And those in the committee will enjoy some perks?
I don't know. Critiquing is a chi li bu tou hao job.

I doubt many ppl will want to volunteer to be part of this committee.

Any suggestions??

 

[MatthewSCL]

how about we divide into catories...like

1) composition?
2) Story telling (Optional)?
3) Color/saturation/sharpness? (Optional)
3) Mood of the picture?
4) Feeling of the viewer?
5) Further improvements (or maybe we can phrase it as other point of view?



:dunno:

 

[clive]

just say what u feel when doing crituque. that would be most natural.