"cheaper wide lens for nikon FX"

[aspenx]

hahaha.. yeah i realize the 14-24 is the best, but budget does not allow to do so.. finally i come up with two final options.
Combo1 : Nikkor 14-24, 24-70, 85f1.4
Combo2 : Tamron 17-35, nikkor 24-70, 70-200, 50f1.4
Hope u guys can help me to decide, i realize each individual has his own preference, but i simply want to get input and support in order to ends up with a "wise-er" decision..
thx guys..

Combo 1 minus the 24-70 + 50mm f/1.4 ZF2 + 135mm f/2D DC for me.

 

[Numnumball]

Wow the tammy is pretty good, bro. Great shot.

numnumball, the tammron 17-35 sure does look good.....

Yeah Bros, i was quite convinced too, its really imo one of the very gd "poor man wide angle lens" for FX ard

 

[Numnumball]

hahaha.. yeah i realize the 14-24 is the best, but budget does not allow to do so.. finally i come up with two final options.
Combo1 : Nikkor 14-24, 24-70, 85f1.4
Combo2 : Tamron 17-35, nikkor 24-70, 70-200, 50f1.4
Hope u guys can help me to decide, i realize each individual has his own preference, but i simply want to get input and support in order to ends up with a "wise-er" decision..
thx guys..

Bro hard to decide for u man cos not sure of ur shooting style..

Can u make do without filters for 14-24? if the answer's yes : To fully optimize the the goodness of FX, i will definitely recom Combo 1 (in which i assume it will fit ur needs in the areas of Landscape, General Walk Abt/Portrait/Candids etc.), next u need to ask urself whether can u aford to lose out on the extra reach ur 70-200 vr provides.. U should noe by nw hw often u use ur 70-200 or shoot beyond 85mm...

If not..

I will recom combo 2.

If not better.. Sell off ur 24-70 and get the nikon 17-35 (cut amt of losses)

So u shd have 17-35 f2.8 50 f1.4 (replace ur mid zoom,) 70-200 vr
In a sense hat u r pretty much covered form wide, mid to tele..

HTH