Anyone use Tamron 70-200 F2.8 ?


Status
Not open for further replies.

Bro... u :heart: this lens for so long but never get...



Anyway, the Tamron 70-200 seems to be almost as sharp as the Sony version... matching it in performance in some places. So for that price... the performance is stellar.

If you are comfortable with a third party lens, this should be good enough for your needs.
 

Last edited:
not sure i follow u here..
:confused:
why shouldn't this lens be attractive for FF ?
isn't this tamron 70-200 lens also an FF lens too?

I am talking the Sigma 50-150mm F2.8. Is designed for APS camera body. In FF body (A900), you will get vignetting. Just like Sony DT lenses on A900.
 

Any idea how's the AF speed for this lens??
 

Any idea how's the AF speed for this lens??

There is a DPReview article about the lens

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0806/08061602tamron70200review.asp

Autofocus

This lens features a built-in motor for autofocus on the Nikon and Canon mounts, while the Pentax and Sony variants will couple with the camera body's screw-drive system. The AF motor is unfortunately not of the ultrasonic type, but a simple DC micro motor, and is distinctly the weakest link in the package (on our Canon mount sample at least). Autofocusing on a static object is generally just fine in decent light, but in even moderately low light AF becomes decidedly slow, especially in comparison to the Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS USM on the same body. Continuous AF performance for moving subjects is also disappointing; it's OK for relatively undemanding situations, such as distant subjects moving at a relatively constant speed, but the moment the subject starts moving randomly or at any great pace, the focus motor really struggles to keep up. This lens wouldn't therefore be my first choice for shooting sports and action work (or even simply children running around in the garden).

Though the test is done on Canon...

Yuotube has some clips on its AF speed.

On A200: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3pZt5GHvsw&feature=related

On A700: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJEvxH5qvyA&NR=1

A700 seems faster.
 

i tested this tamron on D7D, a700 and a900 before, its fast when there's decent light
 

I'm a user of tamron 70-200 f2.8.
below is the image with a350 at f/11, 1/80,ISO 400

http://www.facebook.com/photos/?ref=sb#/photo.php?pid=2078069&id=657866871

http://gallery.clubsnap.com/showfull.php?photo=141178

showfull.php


price wise...i bought it @ $1400 early this year from Cathay.
I think the quality compared to 70-200G is pretty close. However,its AF speed is kinda slow compared to the SonyG.
But for half a price..i think it's worth the money.

juz my 2 cents.
 

Last edited:
For the warranty from b&H, is it international or local ?

Cheers
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top