Nope. I bought the A900 for a good reason: maximum resolution at low ISO.
But many people here are hoping for a low-density, high-ISO monster from Sony.
I do not think it would be a good idea though. They would then face all the complaints from the wanna-be buyers about how all the FF lenses are so ex, why couldn't they keep it as APS-C, etc etc etc
Well, human beings are hardest to satisfy. You give them apples, they want oranges. You give them oranges, they say it's not red in colour...:sweat: