A750 coming March/April


Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope. I bought the A900 for a good reason: maximum resolution at low ISO.

But many people here are hoping for a low-density, high-ISO monster from Sony.

I do not think it would be a good idea though. They would then face all the complaints from the wanna-be buyers about how all the FF lenses are so ex, why couldn't they keep it as APS-C, etc etc etc

Well, human beings are hardest to satisfy. You give them apples, they want oranges. You give them oranges, they say it's not red in colour...:sweat:
 

Nope. I bought the A900 for a good reason: maximum resolution at low ISO.

But many people here are hoping for a low-density, high-ISO monster from Sony.

I do not think it would be a good idea though. They would then face all the complaints from the wanna-be buyers about how all the FF lenses are so ex, why couldn't they keep it as APS-C, etc etc etc

well i get your point on why they are offering this MP on FF. Basically thier marketing strategy to satisfy the masses :) wide range of FF for everyone.

In my case, 12MP on a apsc is already making me seek for higher resolution, next option for me is to definitely skip the 14MP FF.
 

OK.............. OK ..................... :rolleyes: ...................... :angel:

hahahah

Of course I answer like that bro... You're in the sony forum after all. ;)
 

Well, human beings are hardest to satisfy. You give them apples, they want oranges. You give them oranges, they say it's not red in colour...:sweat:


thats a good one:bsmilie:
 

Well, human beings are hardest to satisfy. You give them apples, they want oranges. You give them oranges, they say it's not red in colour...:sweat:

thats a good one:bsmilie:

:bsmilie: ya and after that u give them a red orange, they tell u its not authentic cos its genetically modified :bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top