Dear Minoltians,
Now is a bit early for respectable web sites to put up such a review. I would like to share with you my experience with both camera. I hope other people will also follow up this thread with pictures.
What's new in A2 compared to A1:
1) 8 MP (A2) compared to 5 MP (A1)
2) Ultra high continous shooting (7 fps at 640x480) (A1 has 2.8 fps at (2,560 x 1,920))
3) Higher resolution and faster response from EVF and LCD display
4) Higher resolution for video clip recording
5) Depth of view preview
6) ASA 64
7) Pictbridge compatible
8) 3:2 aspect ratio shooting (available only at 3264 x 2176)
9) USB 2.0
10) Ability to enlarge the display by 3.3x
Other issues:
1) A1 max shutter speed is 1/16,000 (hardly use) compared to A2 at 1/4,000
2) A/D conversion for A1 and A2 are 14 and 12 bit respectively
The currently price of A1 and A2 are approximately $1,420-$1,460 and $1,650-$1,750 respectively. The functions of both camera are both identical except the icon in A2 larger than A1. I am really pleased to see the responsiveness of A2 which is much faster than A1. Shutter lag has decreased. Have not timed the "time to next shot" of the continous burst.
I did consider of upgrading from A1 to A2, but decided not to, rather put the money in the upcoming DSLR might be a more sensible thing to do. Both A2 and Sony F828 uses the same sensor. However the CA (chromatic aberration) is quite bad in F828. I need to verify whether this occurs in A2 (CA can also be related to lens). Shots from forum of DPReview showed noise even at ASA64. A2 does addressed some issue of A1 but image quality seem to drop further.
What do you think?
Regards.
Now is a bit early for respectable web sites to put up such a review. I would like to share with you my experience with both camera. I hope other people will also follow up this thread with pictures.
What's new in A2 compared to A1:
1) 8 MP (A2) compared to 5 MP (A1)
2) Ultra high continous shooting (7 fps at 640x480) (A1 has 2.8 fps at (2,560 x 1,920))
3) Higher resolution and faster response from EVF and LCD display
4) Higher resolution for video clip recording
5) Depth of view preview
6) ASA 64
7) Pictbridge compatible
8) 3:2 aspect ratio shooting (available only at 3264 x 2176)
9) USB 2.0
10) Ability to enlarge the display by 3.3x
Other issues:
1) A1 max shutter speed is 1/16,000 (hardly use) compared to A2 at 1/4,000
2) A/D conversion for A1 and A2 are 14 and 12 bit respectively
The currently price of A1 and A2 are approximately $1,420-$1,460 and $1,650-$1,750 respectively. The functions of both camera are both identical except the icon in A2 larger than A1. I am really pleased to see the responsiveness of A2 which is much faster than A1. Shutter lag has decreased. Have not timed the "time to next shot" of the continous burst.
I did consider of upgrading from A1 to A2, but decided not to, rather put the money in the upcoming DSLR might be a more sensible thing to do. Both A2 and Sony F828 uses the same sensor. However the CA (chromatic aberration) is quite bad in F828. I need to verify whether this occurs in A2 (CA can also be related to lens). Shots from forum of DPReview showed noise even at ASA64. A2 does addressed some issue of A1 but image quality seem to drop further.
What do you think?
Regards.