Recent content by lenzz

i am wrong.. its 3rd party batt. not lens http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=454440

I read in one of the threads 3rdparty lens not working properly in d300. (i might be wrong) pls search here and spend wisely

does anyone have experience and/or comments about 85mm f1.4 or 85mm f1.8 ? thanks

I am also very new into HDR photography, my mates suggest(who are in HDR photography for a while) that when we start, it will be better to start off with day light pictures and once we master the PP it will be bettter to do night HDRs.

Thanks for all the pointers.. really helpful. I will focus on these points in my next try.

ok.. here is the tower bridge :embrass:

thanks for the honest opinion ;p

true, there is no tower bridge in the pic. In fact that day was bit odd.. the temp was around 2deg. and sun playing hide & seek. While i took this pic.. there was sun light on the gerkin (the bullet shaped building) and in some portion of the river.. :bigeyes:

Not sure... i had 5 exposures shot in JPEG -2, -1, 0 +1, +2 exposures then tone mapped the Dynamic-Photo HDR.. i think i did bit of over-do tone mapping i guess.. But when i talk to some friends here.. they argue the best exposures for HDR is -5, 0 +5 (as in Nikon D90 D300 D700)

true... there is no tower bridge in the pic :) but i shot this by standing near tower bridge ;)

I use dynamic-photo hdr

is this a 3 exp. (-2 0 -2 or more..) HDR or a RAW single pic. hdr conversion.. ? Nice work on the 2nd pic.. looks better than the previous one :thumbsup:

I am also saving up for 70-200 f4/L the non-IS version.. which is considered the best value for money and best of the group.. IMHO.... after reading a lot of reviews i am thinking as i am not a PRO photographer.. i will settle for this.. certainly f2.8/L IS USM is the best... but i was thinking...

This is my 2nd HDR try photo... C&C welcome pls Thanks