Recent content by hairygorillaz

Do you mean that the lens cannot focus? Or that the back part of the insect is blur? If the back in blur, it could be that your aperture is too wide. If the lens cannot focus, it could be due to the minimum focussing distance.

I think its a good to have. Most people will still stick to using the VF. I think

I agree that lack of contrast is not the problem. I wanted to take one from across the street, but trees were blocking and my prosumer doesn't allow me to go wider as i was already squatting down. I get what you mean about the crop though.

This is a picture of "The New 7th Story Hotel" I converted it to black and white and used PS to "simulate" a red filter to darken the sky. But i feel that there is something lacking in composition. Any tips or comments? Thanks in advance

Ok. Thanks for your input...will work at it.

For #4, the Singapore Flyer IS the subject...

Hmm. For #3 and 4, is there a way to remove the clutter? I can't seem to get my horizons perfectly straight. Any tips?

Here are some old photos that I took in the CBD area. No PP done. Comments and criticism are welcomed...Be as brutal as possible....The eventual aim is to improve..

jpeg. Only because my camera cannot capture raw.

If he is using a large aperture, shouldn't the DOF be small?

it depends on the photo.

The +4 close up can't?

Whats the difference between a 2X teleconverter and a +4 close-up filter? Since both magnify by a factor of 2, whats the difference?

There is +10 ar? I thought most places only carry until +4.

well, it all depends on what you want to shoot. Different things require different settings.