Recent content by GoneDrinkin

sold to a nice buyer. thread closed.

price down to $300! for this canon 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS, clearing by this friday for new upgrades. :D

forgot to add, front and back lens caps also included. thanks.

Advertisement Category: Want To Sell (WTS) Equipment Type: Lens Equipment Brand: Canon Equipment Model: EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS Price (S$): 320 Description: Selling a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS Lens. Bought on the 24th of April 2010, with warranty registered online. (which if i'm not...

firstly, i've mentioned that i'l keep my kit lens and use it whenever needed, i don't hate it, but i don't love it too. yeah i agree i do have enough range to cover, thing is, i don't need the >140(+-) with a 1.6x with f4-5.6, thats why i wanna sell it, impulse buy. i do agree with you that i...

well, its true that i'm mostly decided but i'm still open to suggestions, new thoughts: 1. canon 10-22 or sigma 10-20? 2. canon 28mm f1.8 or sigma 30mm f1.4? still really doubt 3rd party lenses =/ quality, sharpness and everything, you know, affected by the 3rd party lens rumour going...

yeah. i have doubts about 3rd party lenses, don't trust them. haha. no offence intended. yep yep, keeping the 18-55, well, just in case. i'm leaning towards the 28mm f1.8 usm instead of 35f2. how about that? 50f1.4 not getting that, alr have the 1.8.

thanks for your contributions, anyway, to clarify. 1. for uwa, i'm 85% going for 10-22 instead of primes uwa, there's still the 15% room for info which i haven't caught after reading a few reviews and reading threads in CS. 2. 18-55, the aperture range is pretty restrictive, except in...

hmm, i've been reading on this major dilemma on primes and zooms. i'm using a 500d, currently equipped with a canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens (which somehow found restrictive) bought as kit, canon 50mm f/1.8 (loving it), and a canon 55-250mm (impulse buy i would say). i'm thinking of selling...

hmm, i've been reading on this major dilemma on primes and zooms. i'm using a 500d, currently equipped with a canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens (which somehow found restrictive) bought as kit, canon 50mm f/1.8 (loving it), and a canon 55-250mm (impulse buy i would say). i'm thinking of selling...

i bought for exactly the same. except that.. uv protection lens? i bought Kit 1. extended warranty so it's about 1549. hmm, do i have to buy filter too?

thanks! hmm so basically, G10 way superior in terms of close up shots ( like indoors, macros, short distance scenery (eg cliff's 300m away), while superzoom's better at taking objects/structures far away?

i like shooting scenery, animals/insects, as well as indoors. however, superzoom cam = scenery? take for example, marina barrage taking the singapore flyer. or, natural cliffs from a probably 500m distance, birthday parties, insects and animals. sorry, "when you don't mess with the lens so...

dilemma, dont know which to choose! i need help. most of the prices of each camera is about the same, except for the G10, about 100-150bucks more expensive. (if it's worth it i dun mind spending the extra) the thing is, i've done the comparison and the thing that bothers me the most is its...

what i meant was, i didnt need to spend money on a camera, just film and maintenance costs. there's like fungus in the lens/dust in the lens. and am unable to clean it entirely. maybe i'l just ask them, since i need to go down to the service centre to buy the battery.