Agreed.. I first tested the focal length at my kit lens at 50mm and didnt like it. Subject became too close and i needed space to get the shot i want. But with 35mm, it covers more area and i dont need to back up so much. Plus the sharpness in dim settings is uber and i love the bokeh.. And its...
i prefer the 28mm... hmm.. can cover more area.. what is that term again?
i think with all the reviews and advice from all of you awesome peeps, i have decided to get the 35mm 1.8g..
nikon sg put a price at $399. nice price.. but i wonder whats it gonna be like at the shops...
I agree with you on the f1.4. It's really pricey. And whether am I gonna change to an Fx body only time will tell. I'm still pretty happy with my d90. So for me to decide between 35mm and 50mm I'm gonna try the length on my kit lens and I'll decide which I am most comfortable with.
By the way...
thanks all for the input.
thanks for the advice i'll use my kit lens to decide which works better for me. so as u say the 35 mm will be better for money?
alright then. so which did you prefer? the 35mm or the 50mm? i also read that such lens are used by amateurs and professionals alike. so...
I own a d90. And im finally decided to get myself a prime lens. But im torn between 50mm 1.8g and 35mm 1.8g. And some even say i should get a 50mm 1.8D instead because im using a d90.
Im practically clueless and i dont wanna get the wrong thing. I did try to read up on the different lenses but...
I know it sounds weird right lol amazingly i read a couple of reviews saying its a workable distance.
Anyways since you have debunked that and recommended me the rest i'll definately look into that and buy one. Thanks alot.